Skip 
Navigation Link
Health Insurance
Resources
Basic InformationLatest News
Today Is the Deadline for Obamacare 2018Making Insurers Participate in Marketplace Could Cut VolatilityFriday Is the Deadline for Obamacare 2018CVS-Aetna Merger Has Implications for Doctors' OfficesInsurance Ups the Odds of Beating CancerAs Tax Bill Unfolds, What's In Store for Obamacare's Individual Mandate?Will CVS-Aetna Merger Mean Cheaper Health Care?Differences in Cancer Survival by Type of InsurancePreventive Care for Adolescents Up Since ACA ImplementationNot 'Dead' Yet: Obamacare 2018 Sign-up Has BegunMany U.S. Cities Lack Health Insurance CompetitionObamacare Widened Access to Cancer CareMost Americans Shouldn't See Big Rise in Obamacare PremiumsTrump Signs Executive Order That Could Undermine ObamacareWhite House to Roll Back Birth Control Mandate in Employers' Health Care PlansInsurance Type Linked to Surgery Delay in MelanomaThe Unexpected Faces of the UninsuredFewer Uninsured Cancer Patients After Medicaid ExpansionRepublicans Abandon Health Reform BillAnother GOP Senator Says No to Latest Obamacare Repeal EffortInsurer Market Power Lowers Providers' PricesNarrow Networks in ACA Marketplace for Mental HealthHidden Gems in Your Health Insurance PlanNearly 25 Million U.S. Workers Now Have High-Deductible Health PlansRepublicans Take Another Run at Obamacare OverhaulObamacare Paid Off for Poorer Cancer PatientsMost People Not Bargain Hunters When It Comes to Health CareSenate Says No to 'Skinny' Obamacare Repeal BillNew Alcohol Screening, Brief Intervention Manual DevelopedSenate Rejects Repeal of Obamacare Without ReplacementSenate Prepares for Health Care VoteInsured, But Still Barred From Top-Tier Cancer CentersAs Efforts to Repeal Obamacare Fail, Future of Health Care Reform in LimboRevised Senate Bill Would Allow Bare-Bones Health PlansAmerican Adults Without Health Insurance Rises by Two MillionLack of Health Insurance Can Shorten Lives: StudySenate GOP Leaders Delay Vote on Health Reform BillSome Republicans Voice Concerns About Senate Replacement for ObamacareSenate Republicans Reveal Their Replacement for ObamacareHealth Insurers Recruiting Former Pharma Reps to Cut CostsLeading Medical Groups Mobilize Against Obamacare RepealUncertainty for Obamacare Plans as Filing Deadline Approaches4 in 10 Job-Based Health Plans in U.S. Are Now 'High-Deductible'High-Risk Pools May Represent Step Back for U.S. Health CareCBO: 23 Million Would Lose Health Insurance Under House Health Care BillObamacare a Win-Win for Poorer Adults: StudyCDC: Slowing of Decline in Number of Uninsured AdultsPeople With Pre-Existing Health Issues Fear Repeal-and-Replace BillIncreases in Rates of Insured Don't Harm Continuously InsuredGOP Health Reform Push Faces Uncertain Future in the Senate
Questions and AnswersLinksBook Reviews
Related Topics

Health Policy & Advocacy
Healthcare
Workplace and Career Issues

Insured, But Still Barred From Top-Tier Cancer Centers

HealthDay News
by By Dennis Thompson
HealthDay Reporter
Updated: Jul 20th 2017

new article illustration

THURSDAY, July 20, 2017 (HealthDay News) -- Choosing a cheaper health plan could cost you access to cream-of-the-crop cancer doctors and facilities, a new study reports.

Less-expensive "narrow network" health plans are much less likely to cover treatment by doctors at centers affiliated with the U.S. National Cancer Institute, said study lead author Laura Yasaitis.

"We found that the narrower networks were more likely to systematically exclude NCI-affiliated physicians," said Yasaitis, a postdoctoral researcher with the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. "The oncologists they included in their networks were about half as likely to be NCI-affiliated as those they excluded."

NCI-Designated Cancer Centers are the nation's top-flight facilities for cancer care, and studies have shown that patients treated at these centers tend to have better outcomes, Yasaitis said.

Access to these centers is particularly important for patients with rare or difficult-to-treat cancers, or patients interested in cutting-edge treatments being tested in clinical trials, said Dr. Nancy Keating, a professor of health care policy and medicine at Harvard Medical School.

"This could come as a big shock to patients who are in a narrow network plan and get sick and, uh oh, they can't get access to the care they want," Keating said.

Narrow provider networks have become a means by which some health insurance companies control costs, Yasaitis said.

Insurers negotiate lower prices with a select group of doctors and hospitals, and pass those savings on to consumers in the form of lower premiums. But there's a catch -- plan customers can only use that "narrow" group of providers for their medical care.

Typically, narrow networks are defined as covering fewer than 25 percent of an area's physicians, according to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

"People are looking for policies that have low premiums, and some of those policies have low to no coverage for cancer care," said Dr. Robin Zon, an oncologist in Mishawaka, Ind. She also chairs the American Society of Clinical Oncology's government relations committee.

Yasaitis and her colleagues examined coverage of doctors in 51 geographic regions near the nation's 69 NCI-Designated Cancer Centers.

There were 248 provider networks in those regions, Yasaitis said. Roughly one-third (86) met the definition of a narrow network.

About 17 percent of cancer doctors included in the narrow networks were associated with an NCI center, versus 34 percent of oncologists excluded from the networks, Yasaitis said.

Further, the researchers discovered that access to NCI-affiliated doctors and cancer centers increased as networks became broader and included more providers.

This doesn't necessarily mean that a person with a narrow network plan can't have their cancer successfully treated, Keating said.

"For typical run-of-the-mill cancers, it's not clear to me it's any better to get your care from a cancer center than an oncology practice near your home," Keating said.

But for patients with cancers that are either rare or require complex surgery or advanced treatments, access to an NCI-Designated Cancer Center can be a matter of life or death, Yasaitis and Keating said.

The problem is that it's very difficult for consumers to figure out what is actually covered by their health plan, Keating said.

"When you're choosing your plan, it's hard enough to know whether your own doctor is in a network," Keating said. "To go to the next step and say, 'Suppose I develop cancer sometime this year, could I actually go to Dana-Farber Cancer Institute?' -- nobody does that."

Even medical students at Harvard struggle with this. In one class, students are asked to go online and pick the best health plan, Keating said.

"Almost always without fail these students pick a plan that's relatively low-cost, because they say, 'I'm healthy and I don't need a lot of health insurance,' " Keating said. "Then you start talking with them about why you think this plan is lower cost than that one, and they basically don't have a good answer."

More transparency could help, Yasaitis said. For example, health insurance marketplaces could require health plans to clearly list their provider networks, including medical centers that focus on treatment of serious health problems like cancer or heart disease.

For now, patients who learn they are in a narrow network but need access to an NCI-affiliated cancer center can appeal to their insurer for a waiver, Keating said.

"If you do have a cancer that's unusual or rare, it's worth working with your doctors to appeal to the insurance company," Keating said. "There's a good chance some of those appeals would be successful."

The study appears in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

More information

For more on narrow provider networks, visit the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.