Skip 
Navigation Link
Health Policy & Advocacy
Resources
Basic InformationMore InformationLatest News
Reminder, Recall Systems Improve Immunization UptakeSatisfaction Higher in Providers Who E-Mail PatientsRestaurant Bans Have Big Impact on Smoking RatesReduce Legal Blood-Alcohol Limit to Cut Drunk Driving Deaths: ReportFrom Birth On, One Sex Is HardierIs Obesity Slowing Gains in U.S. Life Spans?Health Tip: Perform Regular Skin ChecksFewer Hospitals Closed After Obamacare Expanded MedicaidProgress in Fighting Antibiotic Resistance Shown in CDC MapUSPSTF Questions Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis ScreeningHIV Screening Most Optimal at 25 Years of Age If No Risk FactorsBlood Banks Need January DonorsChild Death Rate Higher in U.S. Than Other Wealthy NationsPoor Credit Scores, Poor HealthClean Air Act May Be Saving More Lives Than ThoughtHealth Tip: Make Your Doctor's Appointment SuccessfulOb-Gyns Encouraged to Consider Social Determinants of HealthU.S. Life Expectancy Drops as Opioid Deaths SurgeFDA Gets Tough With Homeopathic MedicinesState Rules Affect Survival of Immigrants With Kidney FailureTougher State Laws Curb Vaccine RefusersDoctors Must Report on at Least 1 Patient, 1 Measure for MACRADecline in Antibiotic Use in Livestock Isn't Enough, Critics SayWoman's Selfie of Skin Cancer Went Viral, Sparked AwarenessCan Video Games Hone ER Docs' Skills?Higher Booze Taxes Might Pay Off for Public HealthAre Emergency Medical Workers Ready for a Nuclear Attack?Pediatric Oncologists Willing to Consider Medical MarijuanaHow to Perk Up the Holidays for Hospital PatientsWhat to Do If Someone's Bleeding BadlyAre Good Kidneys Going to Waste?U.S. Gun Sales Rose After Sandy Hook Massacre: StudyCreating Your Family Health TreeLocal Smoke-Free Laws Tied to Fewer Lung Cancer CasesYour Doc Is Away? Substitute Doctors a Safe Option, Study FindsChecking Prices for Medical Procedures Online? Good LuckPatients More Prone to Complain About Younger DoctorsPatients Often Uncomfortable With Overlapping SurgeriesClinician Denial of Patient Requests Impacts SatisfactionPatients React Poorly When Docs Say 'No'Memo to Doctors: Spit Out the Bad NewsDoubts Raised About Use of Products Containing OxybenzoneReport: Industry Hid Decades-Old Study Showing Sugar's Unhealthy EffectsMany Health Care Providers Work While SickMore Patients Are Having a Say in Their Medical CareFDA Seeks to Speed Development of 'Regenerated' Organs for Medical UseHealth Care Experts in Favor of Patient Contribution to NotesMillions Could Miss Out on a Potential Alzheimer's BreakthroughU.S. May Still Benefit From Climate AccordHealth Tip: Spread Awareness of the Opioid Epidemic
Questions and AnswersLinksBook Reviews
Related Topics

Health Insurance
Healthcare

Cardiac Arrest? Someday, Drones May Come to Your Rescue

HealthDay News
by By Alan Mozes
HealthDay Reporter
Updated: Jun 13th 2017

new article illustration

TUESDAY, June 13, 2017 (HealthDay News) -- Drones have been proposed for some pretty mundane uses, such as delivering pizzas or packages, but new research suggests the high-flying machines could be used to swoop in and save lives.

Swedish researchers think drones can quickly deliver defibrillators to someone whose heart has suddenly stopped beating.

"Each minute that passes after a sudden cardiac arrest decreases the chance of survival by approximately 10 percent," explained lead investigator Andreas Claesson. He's a paramedic with the Center for Resuscitation Science at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm.

"In rural areas, a drone carrying an AED [automated external defibrillator] could arrive far ahead -- meaning 16 minutes [faster] -- of emergency medical services," he said.

And that, Claesson said, could "potentially save lives through earlier defibrillation as carried out by bystanders onsite."

When someone in a hospital has a sudden cardiac arrest, trained staff can immediately use a life-saving defibrillator. These machines electrically shock the heart in the hope of restoring a normal beating rhythm.

If sudden cardiac arrest happens outside a hospital, emergency teams must battle traffic and distance to deliver defibrillators to those in need.

But the new study suggests that drones might be able to outpace ambulances by speeding unobstructed over clogged roads and long distances to drop an easy-to-use AED into the hands of people already on location.

Only about 10 percent of cardiac arrest patients pull through. But a super-fast application of CPR can roughly double or even triple a patient's survival prospects, Claesson said.

The challenge has been connecting patients with trained emergency medical services (EMS) professionals in a timely way, Claesson noted, particularly in rural settings where hospitals and AED equipment are often far-flung. This means that "the people in the vicinity of a cardiac arrest are crucial for survival," because they're essentially the first caregivers.

It's with that scenario in mind that the study set out to see if delivering defibrillators by drone would be effective, according to Claesson.

The U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute noted that AEDs are specially designed to be portable and usable by untrained bystanders.

The devices are often found in public facilities, such as sports venues, malls and airports.

Still, they're not always in reach. And that means that when a cardiac arrest happens, many Americans -- particularly those in remote areas -- must call 911.

For the study, the Swedish research team outfitted a Stockholm-area fire station with a drone developed by the Swedish Transportation Agency. The devices were fully equipped with an AED, GPS, autopilot software, and a high-definition camera.

In 2016, investigators conducted 18 remotely operated simulated drone deliveries. The locations were within a roughly 6-mile radius of the fire station. Actual patients had experienced a cardiac arrest at each location sometime between 2006 and 2014.

The drone delivered the AED in just over 5 minutes. That compared with an average standard EMS delivery time of 22 minutes. That meant a delivery savings of almost 16 minutes, according to the report.

The average time to take-off was just 3 seconds after ordering a drone dispatch. For EMS, the average call to dispatch time was 3 minutes, the study found.

Because no actual patients were on hand and there was a second drone pilot on hand at the landing site, Claesson said his team doesn't know how well the bystanders might interact with the drone or the AED. He also noted that aviation regulations will clearly have to be considered if such a system was ever implemented.

American College of Emergency Physicians spokesperson Dr. Leigh Vinocur serves as medical director of the urgent care division at MedStar Health in Columbia, Md.

She pointed out that the current investigation is "very small," and didn't account for real-world variables that could affect drone delivery, such as bad weather.

Yet Vinocur nonetheless views the theoretical prospect of drone-delivered defibrillators as "a great idea with a lot of potential."

"We know that out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has a high mortality, that improves with both bystander CPR and early defibrillation with AED," Vinocur said.

But Vinocur said some communities have limited nearby access to AEDs.

"Not only do greater distances have to be traversed to get to patients as well as transport to hospitals, there sometimes might not be enough equipment and personnel to cover multiple calls at once," she said.

But, "in this study, they did find that in all instances the drone arrived before EMS," a delivery speed innovation that Vinocur thinks could someday prove to be "clinically significant."

The study was published as a research letter published in the June 13 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

More information

There's more on cardiac arrest at the U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.