Skip 
Navigation Link
Health Policy & Advocacy
Resources
Basic InformationMore InformationLatest News
FDA Seeks to Speed Development of 'Regenerated' Organs for Medical UseHealth Care Experts in Favor of Patient Contribution to NotesMillions Could Miss Out on a Potential Alzheimer's BreakthroughU.S. May Still Benefit From Climate AccordHealth Tip: Spread Awareness of the Opioid EpidemicKnowing Too Much About Your Genes Might Be RiskyHealth Tip: Participating in a Clinical TrialMusic, Video Help Sixth-Graders Master Hands-Only CPRIncreases in U.S. Health Spending Tied to Health Service PriceHealth Tip: Prevent Germs at the Doctor's OfficeInfo Via Social Media Apps May Increase Vaccine AcceptanceIt's 'Buyer Beware' When Purchasing Medical Pot Extract OnlineGetting Self-Driving Cars on the Road Soon Might Save LivesHealth Tip: Defining Health LiteracyDoctor Burnout: A Big Health Threat in U.S.About Half of Americans Get Health Care in ERPricing Interventions Increase Sales, Intake of Healthy FoodsHealth Tip: Get to Know Your PharmacistRobots May Be Cleaning Your Hospital Room SoonCMS Launches Initiative to Examine Impact of RegulationsPatients Prefer Face-to-Face Communication, No ComputerDrop Off Your Unused Meds Saturday on 'Take Back Day'Concerns Surround Use of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic TestingMost Patients Satisfied With Relationship With PhysicianModule Developed to Improve Adult Vaccination RatesA Drug Company's Gift Might Change How Your Doctor PrescribesAlmost 4 in 10 Tanning Salons Flout State LawsDEA Taking Back Unwanted Prescription Drugs on Oct. 28Most in U.S. Don't Agree That Household Guns Up Suicide RiskCan Gun Shows Trigger Gun Violence?Tighter Rules on Arsenic in Water Saved Lives: StudyHerbal and Dietary Supplements Are Commonly Mislabeled3 Million Americans Say They Carry Handguns Every DayMany Dermatology Guideline Authors Get Industry PaymentsDoctors Urged to Speak With Patients About FirearmsStates That Make You Wait to Buy Guns Have Fewer Deaths: StudyHomicides Devastate Black Communities, But Prevention Gets Little FundingBetter Patient Communication Needed After Urgent CareQuality Issues for Both Paper-, Electronic-Based Health RecordsRide-Sharing Services Could Cut Alcohol-Related CrashesLow-Cost Services a Major Player in Unnecessary Health SpendingMedical License Questions Sway Doctors' Mental Health Help'Heat-Not-Burn Cigarettes' Aiming for U.S. MarketInjured Patients Want More Info on Safety Improvement EffortsFDA Approves Test to Screen Donated Blood for Zika21 Percent of Americans Report Experiencing a Medical ErrorUber Can Help Cut Car Crashes, But Not EverywhereThe Unexpected Faces of the UninsuredHealth Tip: Giving BloodCommunication Program Doesn't Raise Hospital Liability Costs
Questions and AnswersLinksBook Reviews
Related Topics

Health Insurance
Healthcare

High Costs for Myeloma Patients Not Getting Low-Income Subsidy


HealthDay News
Updated: May 31st 2017

new article illustration

WEDNESDAY, May 31, 2017 (HealthDay News) -- There is a substantial financial burden for Medicare beneficiaries with myeloma who do not receive a low-income subsidy (LIS) for orally-administered anticancer therapy, according to a study published online May 25 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Adam J. Olszewski, M.D., from Rhode Island Hospital in Providence, and colleagues identified Part D beneficiaries diagnosed with myeloma in 2007 to 2011. In multivariable models adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, the authors analyzed the correlation between LIS and use of immunomodulatory drug (IMiD)-based therapy, delays between IMiD refills, and select health outcomes.

The researchers found that 41 percent of 3,038 beneficiaries received first-line IMiDs. For the first IMiD prescription, the median out-of-pocket cost was $3,178 and $3 for LIS nonrecipients and recipients, respectively; for the first year of therapy the corresponding median costs were $5,623 and $6. LIS receipt correlated with a 32 percent increased probability of receiving IMiDs among beneficiaries aged 75 to 84 years, and, in all groups, with a significantly lower risk of delays between refills (adjusted relative risk, 0.54). There was no significant difference in duration of therapy for LIS recipients and nonrecipients (median, 7.6 months). Significantly fewer emergency department visits and hospitalizations were seen for patients treated with IMiDs versus those receiving bortezomib without IMiDs.

"Medicare beneficiaries with myeloma who do not receive LISs face a substantial financial barrier to accessing orally administered anticancer therapy, warranting urgent attention from policymakers," the authors write.

Several authors disclosed financial ties to the biopharmaceutical industry.

Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)