Skip 
Navigation Link
Health Policy & Advocacy
Resources
Basic InformationMore InformationLatest News
Reminder, Recall Systems Improve Immunization UptakeSatisfaction Higher in Providers Who E-Mail PatientsRestaurant Bans Have Big Impact on Smoking RatesReduce Legal Blood-Alcohol Limit to Cut Drunk Driving Deaths: ReportFrom Birth On, One Sex Is HardierIs Obesity Slowing Gains in U.S. Life Spans?Health Tip: Perform Regular Skin ChecksFewer Hospitals Closed After Obamacare Expanded MedicaidProgress in Fighting Antibiotic Resistance Shown in CDC MapUSPSTF Questions Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis ScreeningHIV Screening Most Optimal at 25 Years of Age If No Risk FactorsBlood Banks Need January DonorsChild Death Rate Higher in U.S. Than Other Wealthy NationsPoor Credit Scores, Poor HealthClean Air Act May Be Saving More Lives Than ThoughtHealth Tip: Make Your Doctor's Appointment SuccessfulOb-Gyns Encouraged to Consider Social Determinants of HealthU.S. Life Expectancy Drops as Opioid Deaths SurgeFDA Gets Tough With Homeopathic MedicinesState Rules Affect Survival of Immigrants With Kidney FailureTougher State Laws Curb Vaccine RefusersDoctors Must Report on at Least 1 Patient, 1 Measure for MACRADecline in Antibiotic Use in Livestock Isn't Enough, Critics SayWoman's Selfie of Skin Cancer Went Viral, Sparked AwarenessCan Video Games Hone ER Docs' Skills?Higher Booze Taxes Might Pay Off for Public HealthAre Emergency Medical Workers Ready for a Nuclear Attack?Pediatric Oncologists Willing to Consider Medical MarijuanaHow to Perk Up the Holidays for Hospital PatientsWhat to Do If Someone's Bleeding BadlyAre Good Kidneys Going to Waste?U.S. Gun Sales Rose After Sandy Hook Massacre: StudyCreating Your Family Health TreeLocal Smoke-Free Laws Tied to Fewer Lung Cancer CasesYour Doc Is Away? Substitute Doctors a Safe Option, Study FindsChecking Prices for Medical Procedures Online? Good LuckPatients More Prone to Complain About Younger DoctorsPatients Often Uncomfortable With Overlapping SurgeriesClinician Denial of Patient Requests Impacts SatisfactionPatients React Poorly When Docs Say 'No'Memo to Doctors: Spit Out the Bad NewsDoubts Raised About Use of Products Containing OxybenzoneReport: Industry Hid Decades-Old Study Showing Sugar's Unhealthy EffectsMany Health Care Providers Work While SickMore Patients Are Having a Say in Their Medical CareFDA Seeks to Speed Development of 'Regenerated' Organs for Medical UseHealth Care Experts in Favor of Patient Contribution to NotesMillions Could Miss Out on a Potential Alzheimer's BreakthroughU.S. May Still Benefit From Climate AccordHealth Tip: Spread Awareness of the Opioid Epidemic
Questions and AnswersLinksBook Reviews
Related Topics

Health Insurance
Healthcare

Americans Skeptical of Corporate-Backed Health Research

HealthDay News
by -- Robert Preidt
Updated: May 22nd 2017

new article illustration

MONDAY, May 22, 2017 (HealthDay News) -- Most people don't trust health research when industry is involved, a new study finds.

"People have a hard time seeing research related to health risks as legitimate if done with a corporate partner," said lead author John Besley. He's an associate professor at Michigan State University's College of Communication Arts and Sciences who studies the public's perception of science.

Study participants included adult U.S. residents who were asked to evaluate 15 partnership scenarios for research about genetically modified foods and trans fats. The scenarios included different combinations of scientists from a university, a government agency, a non-governmental organization and a large food company.

Skepticism was much higher when a food company was among the partners, the investigators found. For example, 77 percent of study participants were concerned about company involvement, and questioned whether the research could produce good results.

When a food company wasn't involved, 28 percent expressed doubts about the research, the findings showed.

Scientists spend a lot of time seeking funding for their research, Besley explained in a university news release. Reduced government funding and growing competition for grants mean many researchers have to seek other sources of funding.

"Ultimately, the hope is to find some way to ensure quality research isn't rejected just because of who is involved," Besley said. "But for now, it looks like it may take a lot of work by scientists who want to use corporate resources for their studies to convince others that such ties aren't affecting the quality of their research."

The Michigan State University study was published online recently in the journal PLoS One.

More information

The U.S. National Institutes of Health explains clinical trials.