Navigation Link
Health Insurance
Basic InformationLatest News
Friday Is the Deadline for Obamacare 2018CVS-Aetna Merger Has Implications for Doctors' OfficesInsurance Ups the Odds of Beating CancerAs Tax Bill Unfolds, What's In Store for Obamacare's Individual Mandate?Will CVS-Aetna Merger Mean Cheaper Health Care?Differences in Cancer Survival by Type of InsurancePreventive Care for Adolescents Up Since ACA ImplementationNot 'Dead' Yet: Obamacare 2018 Sign-up Has BegunMany U.S. Cities Lack Health Insurance CompetitionObamacare Widened Access to Cancer CareMost Americans Shouldn't See Big Rise in Obamacare PremiumsTrump Signs Executive Order That Could Undermine ObamacareWhite House to Roll Back Birth Control Mandate in Employers' Health Care PlansInsurance Type Linked to Surgery Delay in MelanomaThe Unexpected Faces of the UninsuredFewer Uninsured Cancer Patients After Medicaid ExpansionRepublicans Abandon Health Reform BillAnother GOP Senator Says No to Latest Obamacare Repeal EffortInsurer Market Power Lowers Providers' PricesNarrow Networks in ACA Marketplace for Mental HealthHidden Gems in Your Health Insurance PlanNearly 25 Million U.S. Workers Now Have High-Deductible Health PlansRepublicans Take Another Run at Obamacare OverhaulObamacare Paid Off for Poorer Cancer PatientsMost People Not Bargain Hunters When It Comes to Health CareSenate Says No to 'Skinny' Obamacare Repeal BillNew Alcohol Screening, Brief Intervention Manual DevelopedSenate Rejects Repeal of Obamacare Without ReplacementSenate Prepares for Health Care VoteInsured, But Still Barred From Top-Tier Cancer CentersAs Efforts to Repeal Obamacare Fail, Future of Health Care Reform in LimboRevised Senate Bill Would Allow Bare-Bones Health PlansAmerican Adults Without Health Insurance Rises by Two MillionLack of Health Insurance Can Shorten Lives: StudySenate GOP Leaders Delay Vote on Health Reform BillSome Republicans Voice Concerns About Senate Replacement for ObamacareSenate Republicans Reveal Their Replacement for ObamacareHealth Insurers Recruiting Former Pharma Reps to Cut CostsLeading Medical Groups Mobilize Against Obamacare RepealUncertainty for Obamacare Plans as Filing Deadline Approaches4 in 10 Job-Based Health Plans in U.S. Are Now 'High-Deductible'High-Risk Pools May Represent Step Back for U.S. Health CareCBO: 23 Million Would Lose Health Insurance Under House Health Care BillObamacare a Win-Win for Poorer Adults: StudyCDC: Slowing of Decline in Number of Uninsured AdultsPeople With Pre-Existing Health Issues Fear Repeal-and-Replace BillIncreases in Rates of Insured Don't Harm Continuously InsuredGOP Health Reform Push Faces Uncertain Future in the SenateHouse OKs Republican Health Care BillAmericans Uneasy With Push to Repeal Obamacare: HealthDay/Harris Poll
Questions and AnswersLinksBook Reviews
Related Topics

Health Policy & Advocacy
Workplace and Career Issues

White House, GOP Lawmakers Revisit Health Care Bill

HealthDay News
by -- Margaret Farley Steele
Updated: Apr 4th 2017

new article illustration

TUESDAY, April 4, 2017 (HealthDay News) -- Conservative Republicans and the White House are reportedly discussing another replacement plan for the Affordable Care Act -- one that could cut benefits for people with pre-existing conditions, according to published reports.

Until now, Republican lawmakers and President Donald Trump have promised to keep the popular provision.

But having failed to garner support last month for their initial attempt to repeal and replace the controversial health care reform law also known as Obamacare, Republicans have begun to consider other ways to win over right-leaning Congressional leaders.

Terms discussed by the White House and the Freedom Caucus -- a group of conservative lawmakers in the House of Representatives -- on Monday evening were reported Tuesday in The New York Times.

Rep. Mark Meadows, R-North Carolina, the head of the Freedom Caucus, told The Times his members would be interested in a bill that includes two significant changes.

One of those changes would allow states to drop the requirement that insurers cover a minimum package of benefits, known as the essential health benefits. The second change would let states jettison the mandate that people of the same age pay the same amount for insurance. That provision of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is known as community rating.

If those provisions took effect, insurance companies would be free to charge sick people whatever they like. In effect, this would eliminate the guarantees for pre-existing conditions, although Meadows said that the provision would retain intact. Technically, that's true, The Times reported.

People with cancer, for example, might still get insurance but find the insurance doesn't pay for essential treatments such as radiation or chemotherapy drugs.

The proposal is still under discussion, and would need support of more moderate Republicans in the House as well as virtually every GOP lawmaker in the Senate, The Times reported.

"The fundamental idea is that marginally sick people would pay with risk associated with their coverage," Meadows said in the news report. "Those that have, you know, premiums that would be driven up because of catastrophic illness or long-term illnesses, we've been dealing with that for a long time with high-risk pools."

Before the ACA was passed in 2010, such high-risk pools operated in many states. People who were denied coverage in traditional insurance markets were eligible for plans at higher-than-average prices and could get help through financial subsidies from their state, The Times reported.

More information

For more about the Affordable Care Act, visit