|Basic InformationMore InformationLatest News|Primary Care Pharmacy Model Attractive to Patients1991-2014 Saw Minimal Change in Health Spending Per StateLegalized Pot May Lead to More Traffic CrashesMany Doctors Silent on Cost of Cancer CareGroup Urges Tougher Limits on Chemical in Shampoos, Cosmetics18 Percent Increase Projected in Primary Care Demand by 2023Why Patients Leave the Hospital Against Doctor's OrdersRaise the Smoking Age to 21? Most Kids Fine With ThatComprehensive Audiologic Care Feasible in Free Clinic ModelMany Tanning Salons Defy Legal Age Limits on UsersLifesaving Drugs From Pfizer in Short Supply: FDALeading U.S. Doctors' Group Takes Aim at Rising Drug PricesU.S. Hospitals Still Prescribe Too Many Antibiotics: StudyFDA Puts Brakes on Rule Requiring New 'Nutrition Facts' LabelCardiac Arrest? Someday, Drones May Come to Your RescueSAMHSA: 9.8 Million U.S. Adults Have Serious Mental IllnessFDA Asks Maker of Opioid Painkiller Opana ER to Pull Drug From MarketHealth System Sees Success With E-Visits Via Patient PortalOvercharging Common in U.S. Emergency RoomsAdvocating for a Loved OneHigh Costs for Myeloma Patients Not Getting Low-Income SubsidyGetting Bedbugs Out of Nursing Homes, Apartment Buildings - for GoodCosts of ER Treatments a Mystery to Many DocsNew Bill Intends to Repeal Limits on Physician-Owned HospitalsTechnology Can Help Patients Facing Routine DecisionsKidneys From Deceased Diabetics Might Ease Organ Shortage: StudyElements of a Patient-Centered Hospital Room IdentifiedCan Tracking Germs in One Hospital Make All Hospitals Safer?Chances of Successful CPR Dwindle as Seniors AgeNew FDA Head Outlines 'Forceful Steps' Against Opioid CrisisChecking Patient's Drug History May Help Curb Opioid AbuseAt Major Teaching Hospitals, Lower Death RatesAmericans Skeptical of Corporate-Backed Health ResearchToo Many Americans Still Go Without Cancer ScreeningsBlack, Hispanic Americans Less Likely to See a NeurologistSome Lead Poisoning Tests May Be FaultyYour Doctor's Age Might Affect Your CareMany U.S. Travelers Skip Measles Shots, Despite Infection RiskPatients Satisfied With Telehealth Primary Care VisitsNearly a Third of Drugs Hit by Safety Issues After FDA ApprovalNo Routine Screening for Thyroid Cancer: Expert PanelPAS: Internet Info Can Lower Parent Trust in Doctors' DiagnosisFDA Warns of Tattoo DangersBystander CPR Not Only Saves Lives, It Lessens Disability: StudyMore Starring Roles for Booze in Kids' Movies, Study FindsMental Health Myths Abound in the U.S.Half of U.S. Docs Get Payments From Drug, Device Industries: StudyAMA Urges Doctors to Talk About Safe Opioid Storage, DisposalRoutine Blood Tests Can Harm Patient CareApril 29 Is National Prescription Drug Take Back DayQuestions and AnswersLinksBook Reviews
Price Transparency Intervention Doesn't Cut Lab Test Orders
Updated: Apr 24th 2017
MONDAY, April 24, 2017 (HealthDay News) -- Clinician test-ordering behavior is not affected by displaying Medicare allowable fees in the electronic health record at the time of order entry, according to a study published online April 21 in JAMA Internal Medicine to coincide with the annual meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine, held from April 19 to 22 in Washington, D.C.
Mina S. Sedrak, M.D., from the City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center in Duarte, California, and colleagues examined the effect of displaying Medicare allowable fees for inpatient laboratory tests on clinician ordering behavior over one year. Data were included for 98,529 patients involved in 142,921 hospital admissions between April 2014 and April 2016. A one-year intervention of displaying Medicare allowable fees in the electronic health record at the time of order entry was compared with a one-year preintervention period.
The researchers found that in adjusted analyses, there were no significant changes in overall test-ordering behavior for the intervention versus the control group over time (0.05 tests ordered per patient-day; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], −0.002 to 0.09; P = 0.06) or associated fees (24 cents per patient-day; 95 percent CI, −42 cents to 91 cents; P = 0.47). Based on patient intensive care unit (ICU) stay, there was a small but significant difference in tests ordered per patient-day (patients with ICU stay: −0.16; 95 percent CI, −0.31 to −0.01; P = 0.04; patients without ICU stay: 0.13; 95 percent CI, 0.08 to 0.17; P < 0.001) and in the magnitude of associated fees.
"Displaying Medicare allowable fees for inpatient laboratory tests did not lead to a significant change in overall clinician ordering behavior or associated fees," the authors write.
One author disclosed ties to Catalyst Health.
This article: Copyright © 2017 HealthDay. All rights reserved.